EVE Search - An overdue apology and request for parley

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

An overdue apology and request for parley

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 19 post(s)
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.24 00:38:00 - [1] Edited by: Arya Greywolf on 24/06/2011 00:41:47 Edited by: Arya Greywolf on 24/06/2011 00:41:23 EDIT: The high prices of the Noble Xchange is NOT the main issue - for the majority that dislike it, we can ignore it IF you make CQ optional and give us our old hanger view back. The main concerns are these... 1) Many people want CQ to be a button on their OLD hanger view. Why isn't this happening? Why do we have to have CQ forced on us? 2) Address the Internal Document that was put on EvE News.
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.24 00:54:00 - [2] Originally by: CCP Pann The newsletter was not fake. I guess this is how it feels when someone reads your diary, something you hadn't intended anyone else to see. Not to deflect the heat but to explain why what I'm about to say, I wasn't involved with writing it. The only reason I mention that is because I am not going to presume to know the minds of the people who did have comments in there. I am not going to throw people I love under the bus or to the lions or whatever. I can't/won't answer questions about what they said or why they said it. Our newsletters are written as a means to bring about discussion (that sometimes can even become heated debate) among our coworkers. That's really all I can say about it. I am not a game designer. I'm a mouthpiece. I'll admit it. By the time I get involved, the decisions have been made. Not making excuses for myself, just explaining. 1) Fair enough, SO GET THE DEVELOPERS and make them answer. 2) We want our old hanger view back with the OPTION to disembark. Honestly, if you can't answer the questions, you might want to duck your head out because people will just get more frustrated.
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.24 01:10:00 - [3] Originally by: Miilla Translation: Bad news on Friday... vend rage and anger over the weekend... come back on Monday, everythings fine? Pretty much this. We need to get CCP to have someone who can actually answer these issues instead of deflect it all. Don't give up your right to have CQ be a "disembark" button on our old hanger view! And don't give up the fight to resist real $$$ for in-game progression!
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.24 12:32:00 - [4] Originally by: Aganola THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.24 14:42:00 - [5] Edited by: Arya Greywolf on 24/06/2011 14:43:59 Originally by: Bunnyy Lebowski I have included an image of a very quick paint storyboard to help visualize Make Everyone Happy Take it or leave it, thats my idea on the topic. This needs to be kept alive. CCP, It's a great idea and will keep your CQ just fine - hell, I have NO idea why you guys didn't make it like this way from the start. CCP, I think the majority of people want two things. 1) An answer to the internal document and a promise that you will NEVER have money for in-game advantage/progression. 2) The above image implemented in game. When we dock, we get our old hanger view with the PERMANENT OPTION to "disembark." THEN and ONLY THEN will CQ load. This button will be part of the station and/or on our panel UI. CCP PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ISSUES AND FIX THEM. This is probably what 80% of us players are truly disgruntled about.
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.24 21:15:00 - [6] "This week has seen quite a controversy unfold. In almost the same instant as we deployed Incarna - which by the way is one of our more smooth and successful expansions, not to mention absolutely gorgeous - an internal newsletter with rather controversial topics addressed leaked out. To further compound the confusion there was a clear and rather large gap in virtual goods pricing expectation and reality with a large segment of the community. Iæm going to address both these issues right here." - CCP Zulu Aren't you missing something? Like THE OVERWHELMING DESIRE FOR US PLAYERS TO HAVE THE OLD HANGER VIEW BACK AND HAVE THE CQ AS A "DISEMBARK" BUTTON! Seriously, did you guys even read ANY threads? Now, regarding the internal document: "The opinions and views expressed in Fearless are just that; opinions and views. They are not CCP policy nor are they a reliable source of CCP views as a company. The employees who submitted articles to that newsletter did exactly what they were asked to do, write about theories and opinions from an exaggerated stand." What the hell does this even mean? Did you not see the millionth post asking for confirmation that WE DO NOT WANT REAL MONEY TRANSFER FOR IN-GAME PROGRESSION/ADVANTAGE!? How the HELL is that not answered? As far as I'm concerned you totally BLEW over the TWO MAIN issues we wanted to have dealt with. 1) An answer to "Are you EVER going to use aurum for an in game advantage/progression" (via internal document)? 2) We want our OLD hanger view back! After reading the response, I'm extremely upset. No one even cared that much about the damn monocle prices! Did you read the posts? We were mocking the idea of EVEN buying it in the FIRST place! This is fail. 3 accounts still unsubbed. Sadface.
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.24 21:33:00 - [7] Originally by: Cutter Isaacson ARE YOU GOING TO BE INTRODUCING NON-VANITY ITEMS INTO THE DAMN NEX STORE OR NOT? THIS ^ + 2) WE WANT OLD HANGER VIEW BACK WITH CQ "DISEMBARK" BUTTON
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.25 02:35:00 - [8] http://www.evenews24.com/2011/06/25/ccp-hilmar-global-email-shows-the-reasoning-behind-ccp-zulu-devblog/ We will not accept more than just vanity items. Period. Give us our old hanger view with disembark option.
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.25 14:18:00 - [9] ARE YOU MOVING BEYOND AURUM-FOR-VANITY ITEMS? ARE WE GETTING OUR OWN HANGER VIEW BACK WITH THE PERMANENT OPTION TO "DISEMBARK" VIA STATION BUTTON?
Arya Greywolf	Posted - 2011.06.26 21:23:00 - [10] Welp, unfortunately this still does not answer the main question/concern we have -directly-. They are still tip-toeing around the issue. CSMs, PLEASE, PLEASE make these our two core issues! Additionally, they did not even ADDRESS the second big issue that players are peeved about - getting the old hanger view back. So, it remains: 1) Are you going to EVER go beyond non vanity items with aurum? 2) Are we going to get the old hanger view back with the permanent option to "disembark" via station button?

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

Translation: Bad news on Friday... vend rage and anger over the weekend... come back on Monday, everythings fine?

ARE YOU GOING TO BE INTRODUCING NON-VANITY ITEMS INTO THE DAMN NEX STORE OR NOT?

THIS ^ + 2) WE WANT OLD HANGER VIEW BACK WITH CQ "DISEMBARK" BUTTON

ARE YOU MOVING BEYOND AURUM-FOR-VANITY ITEMS?

ARE WE GETTING OUR OWN HANGER VIEW BACK WITH THE *PERMANENT* OPTION TO "DISEMBARK" VIA STATION BUTTON?

1) Are you going to EVER go beyond non vanity items with aurum?

2) Are we going to get the old hanger view back with the *permanent* option to "disembark" via station button?

ARE WE GETTING OUR OWN HANGER VIEW BACK WITH THE PERMANENT OPTION TO "DISEMBARK" VIA STATION BUTTON?

2) Are we going to get the old hanger view back with the permanent option to "disembark" via station button?